Top-up fees: a growing risk for councils
Prohibitions orders, assessments and the HSSRS
Highways, kerbs and intervention levels
Local government reorganisation and historic liabilities
The status of co-opted members
Open Justice Principle – Where are the lines drawn in care proceedings?
What's the best way to manage conflict between colleagues in schools and colleges?
Scrutiny of professionals working in Children Act litigation
Teacher dismissed after joking about 'whacking' a pupil: was the decision fair?
Fear of harm and plans for adoption
Electronic and workplace balloting for statutory union ballots
Issues Resolution Hearings, threshold criteria and adequacy of reasons
Foster carers and manifestation of religious belief
Contempt, disclosure failures, and information governance
The ‘Hillsborough Law’, senior leaders and prevention of critical harm
Hoarding and learning from inquests – safeguarding to prevent tragic outcomes
Judging the use of AI
The Hammad appeal – Housing authority responses to homelessness in England and Wales
Natural justice and costs in the Court of Protection
The Procurement Act 2023: 10 months on, how is it going?
Costs, detailed assessment and misconduct
Airport expansion, EIAs and emissions
Boosting localised procurement - Reform to Section 17 LGA 1988
The Autumn Budget and Public-Private Partnerships
Calculation of Biodiversity Net Gain
The new National Licensing Policy Framework
The Social and Affordable Homes Programme: key points
Caravan site licensing and planning control
From 1925 to 2025
Licence revocation appeals and a change in circumstances
Self-neglect and capacity
Renewal of telecoms leases and building safety regulation
Procurement Act 2023: Anticipating and avoiding procurement disputes
Access injunctions: legal pathways to forced access and decants
Preparing for heat network regulation: timelines, obligations, and next steps
The lost enforcement of section 21
Housing case alert - November 2025
Section 21 - It’s not over yet
Expert evidence in housing conditions claims
Inquests and Housing
Wolverhampton Traveller injunctions – where are we now?
Is there a discretion to extinguish CIL?
Balancing public interest and planning control – accommodation of asylum seekers
Meaning of father in s2 Children Act 1989
A “43 moment” for the local government workforce
Section 193 LPA 1925: public access to commons and waste land
Growing apart?
Political and mayoral assistants
PFI expiry and employees
Welsh-medium inquests and the death register
The future of housing: What procurement and contracts teams need to know
No liability for sap falling on the public highway
Weapons in Cardiff educational settings: new guidance for schools
Public Sector High Court Litigation in 2025: Key trends so far
Enjoying the challenge
Abandoning procurements: risky business
The surge in Subsidy Control litigation
Dispersal of asylum seekers
Causation and being “homeless intentionally”
Strengthening the standards and conduct framework for local authorities in England
Facts still very much matter
Court of Appeal rules on exclusions once again
Faith-based oversubscription criteria
How to place children abroad after Re M
Fact finding in the Court of Protection
Discrimination arising from disability: did a school discriminate against a pupil when it excluded her?
Care cases involving multiple allegations
SEND and pupils absent due to health needs
Granting of parental responsibility
Confidentiality clauses and severance payments in FE colleges and Academy Trusts
The importance of an adequate mortgagee exclusion clause
Managing AI Risks in Local Government
Reconciling Conflicting Private and Public Interests on Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects
Subsidy Control – top tips for public authorities referring measures to the CMA's Subsidy Advice Unit
Awaab’s Law and Fitness for Human Habitation – the same, but different?
Daylight/sunlight material consideration for planning purposes
Article 4 Directions in Wales
Not all fun and games
Children law update - October 2025
Where now for the ‘right’ to park?
Zip-wires in caverns
Fix it fast: How “Awaab’s Law” is forcing action in social housing
Housing management in practice: six challenges shaping the sector
The Renting Homes (Wales) Act 2016 and rent paid during periods of unfitness
From the front line of HMO licensing
Housing case alert: September/October 2025
DCLG rebuffs plea from council for help with £33m+ contract cancellation costs
- Details
The Department for Communities and Local Government has turned down a plea from a county council for financial help in relation to the £33.7m settlement costs arising from the termination of a waste contract.
Last week Norfolk County Council revealed that the costs had come in at the higher end of expectations – as a result of hedging arrangements – and that it needed to find £3.4m within three working days.
It has now learned that the DCLG will not contribute to the cancellation costs.
The council’s Leader, George Nobbs, had written to the Prime Minister and other government ministers in April to request financial assistance.
In the letter he blamed the inaction of the Communities Secretary, Eric Pickles. When deciding to terminate the contract with Cory Wheelabrator, the council had cited the failure to secure satisfactory planning permission for an energy from waste plant near King's Lynn.
Baroness Stowell, lead minister for local government procurement at the DCLG, has now confirmed that no financial assistance will be forthcoming from central government.
In her reply, which can be viewed here, Stowell wrote: “In relation to your point on financial assistance for penalty clauses in cancelled procurement contracts, I would simply observe that it seems that your local authority, in this instance, decided to sign a contract with a penalty clause exposing the local authority to a financial risk, costing £30m, on an issue which was not pre-determined and which is subject to quasi-judicial processes.”
The minister added: “The details and clauses of any local procurement contract are a private matter between the relevant parties. It is for the local authority to assess the risks and benefits of any local contract prior to agreeing to it.
“Therefore any need to pay a cancellation penalty is a private contractual matter and is for the local authority to consider how to meet such costs. It is not appropriate for national taxpayers to provide funding for penalty costs, should they arise, from locally-procured contracts.”
Responding to the letter, George Nobbs said: "This puts to bed once and for all the frequent and various suggestions from Henry Bellingham MP that the Government would help the county council if it agreed to terminate The Willows’ contract.
“I'm sure people will agree with me when I say I depreciate the rather dismissive comments made by Baroness Stowell about the efforts and judgement of my predecessor and his administration in relation to this contract.”
At a meeting Norfolk’s Cabinet has called for a report to be drawn up by officers on how the remaining deficit (£4.4m) can be addressed. This report will be discussed by full council next week.
Sponsored articles
Unlocking legal talent
Walker Morris supports Tower Hamlets Council in first known Remediation Contribution Order application issued by local authority
Lawyer (Planning and Regulatory)
Legal Director - Government and Public Sector
Contracts Lawyer
Senior Lawyer - Planning, Property & Contracts Team
Principal Lawyer - Planning, Property & Contract
Locums
Poll
15-07-2026 11:00 am






