Is the support plan produced by the Infrastructure and Projects Authority one you can work with on PFI contract expiry? Martin Cannon looks at the details.
We recently discussed key actions for public authorities in managing a private finance initiative (PFI) project handover following a report on the process issued by the National Audit Office (NAO).
The Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) has since published a ‘support plan’ titled ‘Managing the Risks of PFI Contract Expiry’. In this article we consider the key areas of support offered by the IPA under this plan to aid public bodies on expiring PFI contracts.
What is the purpose behind the support plan?
The IPA’s purpose behind this element of its PFI Contract Management Programme is to provide a structured programme of review, guidance, advice and support to public authorities that are within 7 years of contract expiry.
Given there is a general feeling of lack of preparedness and resources amongst public authorities in relation to expiring PFI contracts, this apparent structured and proactive approach from the IPA is a welcome resource for guidance and assistance.
What are the key areas of support being offered by the IPA?
Expiry Health Checks
A check is offered on all contracts within 7 years of expiry looking at factors such as:
- contract awareness and management;
- the relationships (e.g. between the public authority and the private sector investors);
- condition of the assets;
- commercial planning; and
- future service provision (i.e. the ability of the public authority to ensure continuity of service following expiry).
The guidance suggests that preparations should commence at least 7 years in advance of expiry. It is important to get your house in order as soon as possible on an expiring contract and this data gathering exercise is the first essential limb of a lengthy handover process. This process can help identify any ambiguity in the contractual provisions regarding handover, important key dates and assess the resources required to provide services post-handover. A health check can be performed again closer to expiry.
Assurance of Action Reviews (AAR)
Following a health check, a short-form report is issued with a “traffic light” style rating risk assessment. For example, a project may be rated as red or red-amber due to:
- lack of readiness for expiry;
- significant remedial action requirements; or
- planning requirements.
If so, the IPA aims to follow up with an AAR within 6 months of the health check. The AAR assesses any subsequent actions taken by the public authority and the success of any plans developed and implemented since the previous review. This is an ongoing review process until a green rating has been issued to indicate the project is ready for expiry.
Actions could involve negotiating specific handover arrangements with the private sector counterparty early on in order to agree a process where a historic contract is not clear or safeguarding resources now for use at handover. This is another proactive step in which to keep the handover of the project at the forefront on the contracting parties’ minds. The plans of action and frequent reviews to check on progress should enable the focus on achieving a smooth handover.
Expiry Guidance and Expiry Training
New guidance and training are due to be released by the IPA during Autumn 2021.
The guidance will be based on experience from the current health check system, comprising learnings and practical lessons. The training module to be provided will be the first of a number of modules and is set to be aligned with the expiry guidance.
Private Sector Engagement and Expiry Protocol
The IPA is already involved in structured engagement with market counterparties (such as the private investors and SPVs [insert text box: “Special Purpose Vehicles”] managers). The intention behind this is to share knowledge between the parties and build better relationships.
In line with this, a working “public-private” expiry protocol is due to be released in Autumn 2021. This will set out the expected behaviours of the parties in managing the expiry process. A draft is to be issued to the market counterparties with the IPA hoping to obtain market agreement to the protocol within 6 months of issue.
Combined with the structured private sector engagement already being undertaken by the IPA, the protocol should further enhance collaborative working relationships and encourage resolution of disputes between the contracting parties. Whilst co-operation cannot be guaranteed, this additional transparency offered at the outset with an industry accepted protocol should help guide the parties, lessen the risk of disputes, enable more efficient compromises resulting, preserve funds for the actual handover and service provision itself.
The support plan currently available, alongside the imminent Autumn 2021 additions appear to be invaluable tools available at the disposal of public bodies. Whether the IPA has the resource to maintain this intense level of management and assistance remains to be seen but it is certainly a positive reinforcement that should provide public authorities with a comfort blanket of support in the complex PFI handover process.