The “highly likely” test under s.31(2A) of the Senior Courts Act
Public law case update Q3 2025
Kinship care – latest developments
Roll up, roll up
Proposed changes to the consumer standards
The Employment Rights Act 2025 – Breakdown of Key Dates
Renters’ Rights Act 2025: What’s new for private sector housing enforcement?
HMOs and “self-contained flats”
What impact will the Renters’ Rights Act have on homelessness?
Only or Principal Home…again
Defending Age Assessment Challenges: A Guide for Local Authorities
Top-up fees: a growing risk for councils
Prohibitions orders, assessments and the HSSRS
Highways, kerbs and intervention levels
Providence Building Services Limited v Hexagon Housing Association Limited – The case for a stay
Local government reorganisation and historic liabilities
The status of co-opted members
Open Justice Principle – Where are the lines drawn in care proceedings?
What's the best way to manage conflict between colleagues in schools and colleges?
Scrutiny of professionals working in Children Act litigation
Teacher dismissed after joking about 'whacking' a pupil: was the decision fair?
Fear of harm and plans for adoption
Electronic and workplace balloting for statutory union ballots
Issues Resolution Hearings, threshold criteria and adequacy of reasons
Foster carers and manifestation of religious belief
Contempt, disclosure failures, and information governance
The ‘Hillsborough Law’, senior leaders and prevention of critical harm
Hoarding and learning from inquests – safeguarding to prevent tragic outcomes
Judging the use of AI
The Hammad appeal – Housing authority responses to homelessness in England and Wales
Natural justice and costs in the Court of Protection
The Procurement Act 2023: 10 months on, how is it going?
Costs, detailed assessment and misconduct
Airport expansion, EIAs and emissions
Boosting localised procurement - Reform to Section 17 LGA 1988
The Autumn Budget and Public-Private Partnerships
Calculation of Biodiversity Net Gain
The new National Licensing Policy Framework
The Social and Affordable Homes Programme: key points
Caravan site licensing and planning control
From 1925 to 2025
Licence revocation appeals and a change in circumstances
Self-neglect and capacity
Renewal of telecoms leases and building safety regulation
Procurement Act 2023: Anticipating and avoiding procurement disputes
Access injunctions: legal pathways to forced access and decants
Preparing for heat network regulation: timelines, obligations, and next steps
The lost enforcement of section 21
Housing case alert - November 2025
Section 21 - It’s not over yet
Expert evidence in housing conditions claims
Inquests and Housing
Wolverhampton Traveller injunctions – where are we now?
Is there a discretion to extinguish CIL?
Balancing public interest and planning control – accommodation of asylum seekers
Meaning of father in s2 Children Act 1989
A “43 moment” for the local government workforce
Section 193 LPA 1925: public access to commons and waste land
Growing apart?
Political and mayoral assistants
PFI expiry and employees
Welsh-medium inquests and the death register
The future of housing: What procurement and contracts teams need to know
No liability for sap falling on the public highway
Weapons in Cardiff educational settings: new guidance for schools
Public Sector High Court Litigation in 2025: Key trends so far
Enjoying the challenge
Abandoning procurements: risky business
The surge in Subsidy Control litigation
Dispersal of asylum seekers
Causation and being “homeless intentionally”
Strengthening the standards and conduct framework for local authorities in England
Facts still very much matter
Court of Appeal rules on exclusions once again
Faith-based oversubscription criteria
How to place children abroad after Re M
Fact finding in the Court of Protection
Discrimination arising from disability: did a school discriminate against a pupil when it excluded her?
Care cases involving multiple allegations
SEND and pupils absent due to health needs
Granting of parental responsibility
Confidentiality clauses and severance payments in FE colleges and Academy Trusts
The importance of an adequate mortgagee exclusion clause
Managing AI Risks in Local Government
Reconciling Conflicting Private and Public Interests on Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects
Subsidy Control – top tips for public authorities referring measures to the CMA's Subsidy Advice Unit
Supreme Court to rule next week on environmental impact assessment and downstream greenhouse gas emissions
- Details
The Supreme Court will next week (20 June) hand down its ruling in a landmark case about environmental impact assessments and downstream greenhouse gas emissions.
The issue in R (on the application of Finch on behalf of the Weald Action Group) (Appellant) v Surrey County Council and others (Respondents) is whether under Directive 2011/92 EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017, it was unlawful for the council not to require the environmental impact assessment for a project of crude oil extraction for commercial purposes to include an assessment of the impacts of downstream greenhouse gas emissions resulting from the eventual use of the refined products of the extracted oil.
The background to the case was that in December 2018, the second respondent, Horse Hill Developments, sought planning permission from Surrey County Council, to retain and expand an existing onshore oil well site (comprising two wells) and to drill for four new wells, enabling the production of hydrocarbons from six wells over a period of 25 years.
The environmental impact assessment for the project considered the environmental impacts of "the direct releases of greenhouse gases from with the well site boundary resulting from the site's construction, production, decommissioning and subsequent restoration over the lifetime of the proposed development."
However, it did not assess the environmental impacts of the downstream greenhouse gas emissions that would inevitably result when the oil extracted from the development site was later refined and then used, for example, as fuel.
Surrey granted planning permission for the development on 27 September 2019.
The appellant applied for judicial review of the council's decision, acting on behalf of the Weald Action Group.
Her claim was unsuccessful before the High Court and the Court of Appeal. The appellant appealed to the Supreme Court.
Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, The Office for Environmental Protection and West Cumbria Mining intervened.
The case was heard by a panel comprising Lord Kitchin, Lord Sales, Lord Leggatt, Lady Rose and Lord Richards on 21-22 June 2023.
Sponsored articles
Unlocking legal talent
Walker Morris supports Tower Hamlets Council in first known Remediation Contribution Order application issued by local authority
Principal Lawyer - Planning, Property & Contract
Senior Lawyer - Planning, Property & Contracts Team
Lawyer (Planning and Regulatory)
Legal Director - Government and Public Sector
Contracts Lawyer
Locums
Poll







