The concepts of controller, joint controller and processor play a crucial role in the application of GDPR.
They determine who is responsible for compliance with different data protection rules and how data subjects can exercise their rights in practice.The precise meaning of these concepts and the criterion for their correct interpretation is the subject of much confusion. Incorrect interpretation can lead to the wrong allocation of data protection responsibilities leading to disputes when things go wrong. This workshop will help both controllers and processors to understand their responsibilities and liabilities under GDPR and how to structure their relationships.
This interactive workshop, led by Kirsty Squires, will explain the key differences between data controllers, joint controllers and data processors and what the roles and responsibilities are for each. By the end of this workshop, you will gain the confidence to decide on what an organisation's role is under GDPR and how to manage your relationship with them.
Key Topics
- Understanding the definitions of controller, joint controller, processor
- Third party recipients and why they are different
- Consequences of attributing different roles
- Relationship between controller and processor
- Drafting and managing processor contracts
- Managing processor relationships
- Managing joint controllers
- Liability for non-compliance
- How does all this apply in practice?
- Latest ICO and EDPB Guidance
Event Information
| Event Date | 27-11-2026 10:00 am |
| Individual Price | From £449 plus VAT |
| Location | Online (live) |
02-04-2026 10:00 am
Online (live)
10-04-2026 10:00 am
Online (live)
13-04-2026
Online (live)
14-04-2026
Online (live)
20-04-2026 9:00 am
Online (live)
21-04-2026
Online (live)
21-04-2026
Online (live)
22-04-2026
North-east
22-04-2026 11:00 am
Online (live)
23-04-2026
Online (live)
23-04-2026 10:00 am
Online (live)
Register for event alerts
On demand webinars
The A to Z of Housing Discrimination Case Law - Akerman-Livingstone v Aster
Iris Ferber KC and Karolina Zielinska start at “A”: Akerman-Livingstone v Aster Communities, heard by the Supreme Court in 2015.
The A to Z of Housing Discrimination Case Law: Paragon Housing v Neville
Iris Ferber KC and Peter Jolley discuss Paragon Asra Housing v Neville, heard by the Court of Appeal in 2018.
The A to Z of Housing Discrimination Case Law: Nightingale v Bromford Housing
Iris Ferber KC and Natalie Foster discuss Nightingale v Bromford Housing, heard by the High Court in 2024.
The A to Z of Housing Discrimination Case Law: Laidley v Metropolitan Housing Trust
Iris Ferber KC and Matthew Timm discuss Laidley v Metropolitan Housing Trust, heard by the Court of Appeal in 2025: an important case about Equality Act assessors.
Leaving care provisions demystified!
Ann Osbourne and Alison Pryor discuss local authority duties under the Children Act 1989 and the Care Act 2014 – when the duties arise, what they encompass, human rights assessments, and the interface with the issues of immigration and homelessness.
Chickens, Fish and Lobsters - how are they protected?
42 Bedford Row provide an analysis of legal protections on particular species and case law in the area.
Interveners in financial remedy proceedings
To continue our current family law webinar series, Andrew and Catrin discuss practical tips for intervener claims in financial remedy proceedings – how to identify them, case management, preparing documentation and costs considerations.
Standish 18 months on
Paul Pavlou and Anne Hogarth revisit the case of Standish v Standish 18 months on, examining the judgment’s impact on financial remedy practice and emerging judicial trends, as well as presenting a general case law update.










