Local Government Lawyer


Local Government Lawyer


Local Government Lawyer


Local Government Lawyer

GLD March 26 Planning Lawyer Adhoc Banner 600 x 100 px 1

GLD March 26 Planning Lawyer Adhoc Banner 600 x 100 px 1


A legal challenge to the PFI scheme for a new, £451m Royal Liverpool Hospital has collapsed after legal aid was withdrawn.

Sam Semoff, a member of campaign group Keep Our NHS Public, launched the challenge in the summer of 2010 in a bid to overturn the Health Secretary’s decision to approve the outline business case for the new hospital.

However, at a hearing in November last year Mr Justice Burnett refused to give Semoff permission for a judicial review, stating that he "had no prospect of demonstrating any illegality on the part of the Secretary of State".

The Legal Services Commission has now withdrawn Semoff’s legal aid. The claimant has in turn called a halt to his appeal against Mr Justice Burnett’s decision. A hearing had been due to take place tomorrow (11 February).

Tony Bell, chief executive of the Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, said work could now go ahead, having been delayed since July 2010.

He added: “We are sure that the people of Merseyside, who have given so much support to the new Royal, will be pleased to hear this news particularly given the length of time this project has been delayed.

“We can now press ahead with the exciting task of working with our three bidders to create a world-class hospital for the people of this city. We can also continue with our plans for the Liverpool BioCampus, which will attract significant investment and development opportunities for the whole city. “

The outline business case for the new hospital was assessed by the Department of Health and the Treasury, with approval given in March 2010.

It was reassessed under the Government’s national spending review by the Department of Health and the Treasury and given the green light on 17 June 2010.

“The Trust followed Government guidance, which firmly established that using a PFI scheme was the best value for money - meaning that PFI is the only funding option available,” the hospital said.

A legal challenge to the PFI scheme for a new, £451m Royal Liverpool Hospital has collapsed after legal aid was withdrawn.

Sam Semoff, a member of campaign group Keep Our NHS Public, launched the challenge in the summer of 2010 in a bid to overturn the Health Secretary’s decision to approve the outline business case for the new hospital.

However, at a hearing in November last year Mr Justice Burnett refused to give Semoff permission for a judicial review, stating that he "had no prospect of demonstrating any illegality on the part of the Secretary of State".

The Legal Services Commission has now withdrawn Semoff’s legal aid. The claimant has in turn called a halt to his appeal against Mr Justice Burnett’s decision. A hearing had been due to take place tomorrow (11 February).

Tony Bell, chief executive of the Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, said work could now go ahead, having been delayed since July 2010.

He added: “We are sure that the people of Merseyside, who have given so much support to the new Royal, will be pleased to hear this news particularly given the length of time this project has been delayed.

“We can now press ahead with the exciting task of working with our three bidders to create a world-class hospital for the people of this city. We can also continue with our plans for the Liverpool BioCampus, which will attract significant investment and development opportunities for the whole city. “

The outline business case for the new hospital was assessed by the Department of Health and the Treasury, with approval given in March 2010.

It was reassessed under the Government’s national spending review by the Department of Health and the Treasury and given the green light on 17 June 2010.

“The Trust followed Government guidance, which firmly established that using a PFI scheme was the best value for money - meaning that PFI is the only funding option available,” the hospital said.

Must read

LGL Red line

Sponsored articles

LGL Red line

Unlocking legal talent

Jonathan Bourne of Damar Training sets out why in-house council teams and law firms should embrace apprenticeships.

Jobs

Poll


 

Register for event alerts


Local Government Lawyer will use the information you provide on this form to send your requested updates. Please tick the box above to authorise us to send the alert requested.

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

 

On demand webinars

Leaving care provisions demystified!

Ann Osbourne and Alison Pryor discuss local authority duties under the Children Act 1989 and the Care Act 2014 – when the duties arise, what they encompass, human rights assessments, and the interface with the issues of immigration and homelessness.

Interveners in financial remedy proceedings

To continue our current family law webinar series, Andrew and Catrin discuss practical tips for intervener claims in financial remedy proceedings – how to identify them, case management, preparing documentation and costs considerations.

Standish 18 months on

Paul Pavlou and Anne Hogarth revisit the case of Standish v Standish 18 months on, examining the judgment’s impact on financial remedy practice and emerging judicial trends, as well as presenting a general case law update.

Events

Events

Directory

Directory

Directory