Local Government Lawyer

GLD March 26 Planning Lawyer Adhoc Banner 600 x 100 px 1


Newsletter registration

* indicates required
 
 
 
 
 
Practice/Interest Area(s) (tick all that apply)
  •  
Join our other mailing lists (tick to subscribe)

Local Government Lawyer, Info-Gov.uk and Public Law Jobs will use the information you provide on this form to send your requested newsletters and updates. Please tick the box below to authorise us to send the email newsletter(s) and alerts requested above.

 

 

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

Must read

LGL Red line

More than 200 organisations have written to the Prime Minister, urging the Government not to weaken or remove the legal protections for National Parks and National Landscapes.

The call from charities, businesses, scientists, farmers, and landscape experts comes in response to reports suggesting the Government is considering amending or removing the protected landscapes duty under Section 245 of the Levelling Up and Regeneration Act 2023.

Relevant authorities must 'seek to further' the statutory purposes of National Parks and National Landscapes under the duty, replacing the previous duty on relevant authorities to 'have regard to' their statutory purposes.

However, such a change - which would come via amendments to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill - has been described in the letter as "at odds with this proud history and values".

The signatories also argued that amending the Planning and Infrastructure Bill process without any consultation "would undermine parliamentary conventions and public trust, creating serious uncertainty for businesses and public authorities".

Elsewhere, the letter noted that national parks and national landscapes are "essential to delivering the UK's international commitment to protect and manage 30% of land for nature by 2030 and England's legally binding biodiversity targets".

It added: "Removing or weakening the legal duty on public bodies to help make these landscapes deliver more for people and for nature will erode what makes them special and undermine their economic and environmental potential."

The duty has been described by the chief executive of the North Yorkshire Moors National Park Authority, Tom Hind, as a "positive step" in fostering greater collaboration between public bodies to ensure National Parks and National Landscapes address nature depletion, habitat loss and public access to nature.

Hind, who is one of the letter's signatories, said the duty had also allowed the national park to build stronger partnerships with statutory undertakers such as water companies.

Instead of removing the duty, he called on the Government to look to use the provisions of the Levelling Up and Regeneration Act (LURA) that enable Government to more clearly interpret the duty."

Adam Carey

Sponsored articles

LGL Red line

Unlocking legal talent

Jonathan Bourne of Damar Training sets out why in-house council teams and law firms should embrace apprenticeships.

Poll


 

Past issues

Local Government


Governance (subscribe)


Housing (Subscribe)


Social Care and Education (subscribe)

 


Place (subscribe)

 

Wales (subscribe)

Directory